Loading earlier context…
Retsef Levi Verified@RetsefL

Traditional ACIP mostly unanimous votes were made behind closed doors, based on vendors proprietary data not exposed to the public! Striking disclosure in conversation between @jeremyfaust & @DrJeanneM. They want us to trust the heavily vaccine vendors supported @IDSAInfo! As the chair of ACIP COVID-19 Immunization Products Workgroup since June 2025, I was stunned to learn that there is no documentation of any meeting of the workgroup during 2021-2022! NONE! For 2023-2024, there were one page summaries that had minimal information that didn’t even include who was present in the room! This is what they call a ‘scientific’ trustworthy process… The past workgroup had 70 members mostly representatives of financially conflicted medical associations… And there is no evidence of any proprietary data that were used, nor do I believe it is ethical to tell people to vaccinate without revealing the data used to support the recommendation!

17 76 208 19 15.5K

Export current content

Only the posts currently loaded on this page will be exported.

Text exports

Download immediately with no additional settings.

PDF options PDF only

These settings apply only to the PDF file.